Why Letting Refugees Work is A Win-Win for Host Countries
It’s a new year, but the refugee crisis remains one of the most pressing global issues of our time. There are now nearly 26 million people who have been forcibly displaced from their home countries. With scant prospect of immediate return — one in two refugees is displaced for more than twenty years — we must do more to help refugees integrate into their new communities, and securing a job is one of the most critical steps towards that goal.
Low- and middle-income countries countries like Turkey, Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Uganda shoulder the vast majority of refugees globally – an astonishing 85% (that countries with fewer resources do so much throws in sharp relief how little many members of the OECD do). But while it’s absolutely true that low- and middle-income host countries deserve far more support for the global public good they provide, it’s also the case that these countries could help themselves and their economies by lowering barriers for refugees to work.
Unfortunately, millions of refugees still face considerable hurdles to entering their host country’s workforce. In many low- and middle-income countries, refugees lack any legal right to work or operate a business. For example, in Bangladesh, the nearly one million Rohingya refugees are categorically forbidden to work in any capacity. In other countries, like Turkey and Jordan, refugees are not barred completely from the formal labor market, but face administrative hurdles to securing work permits (Turkey) and/or restrictions on sectors and roles (Jordan). For instance, by the end of 2018, there were only 65,000 work permits had been issued in Turkey for a refugee population well over three million.
Research shows that when refugees are allowed to work and start their own businesses, they stimulate the local economy by spending more on goods and services, generating tax revenue, and creating jobs for members of the host community and other refugees. In Malaysia, for example, refugees are currently unable to work legally, but if the government were to reform its policy – as they promised to do in their electoral manifesto – it’s estimated that refugees would increase Malaysia’s GDP by U.S.$750 million a year through higher spending alone (and the wider economic impact could be substantially larger).
While there is a common fear that if refugees were allowed to work they will take jobs away from members of the host community – a particularly understandable one given that many host countries have their own economic challenges – the truth is that refugees can actually fill labor shortages and complement local skillsets. High-skilled refugees can increase productivity and economic output (and research shows that Venezuelan refugees, for example, are qualified to fill gaps in host country labor markets like Colombia and Peru). And low-skilled refugees can still fill less desirable jobs, creating new opportunities for hosts, enabling them to ‘upgrade’ into higher skilled roles. Major refugee-hosting countries like Turkey and Colombia face localized labor shortages, especially in sectors like agriculture; and countries such as Jordan and Malaysia continue to import tens of thousands of migrant workers, notwithstanding their refugee populations. Far from taking jobs away from locals, in Malaysia it’s estimated that allowing refugees to work legally would create over 4,000 jobs for Malaysians.
Conversely, there are often serious adverse effects when host countries forbid or restrict refugees’ participation in the formal labor market. Firstly, refugees will frequently be forced to work illegally, increasing their risk of exposure to abuse and exploitation. Indeed, countries like Turkey have seen sharp spikes in the incidence of child labor, creating serious reputational problems. Secondly, research shows that restricting refugees to informal work had the effect of concentrating refugees in a few sectors, exacerbating the displacement of locals.
Countries hosting substantial refugee populations face significant economic, fiscal, and political pressures — they deserve our support and gratitude. But there’s a growing body of evidence to suggest that these countries would be better off harnessing the innate talent and potential of the refugees they host by integrating them into the economy. That’s a perspective that OECD members, in their role providing financial assistance to some of these host countries, and multinational businesses would do well to elevate.